It’s human nature to always be searching for – and awed by – the latest and greatest. That tendency certainly extends to the automotive world, where the best new cars get all the headlines. But there are some important lessons to learn if we reverse course and look at some of the worst cars in history.
There was a good idea hiding somewhere within all of these vehicles, but in each case those good intentions were betrayed by ulterior motives, fueled collectively by a calamitous combination of greed, frugality, ego and short-sightedness. The result is five of the worst cars ever.
DeLorean DMC-12
It may be strange seeing the DeLorean DMC-12 on this list of the worst cars in history considering its fame and popularity. But off the silver screen, the car fell far short of expectations.
Former General Motors executive John DeLorean touted the DMC-12 as the sports car of the future. With its gull wings and sleek metallic look, it certainly has the aesthetics to meet that boast. But behind that façade was a heavy, underpowered and overpriced vehicle.
Originally, the company expected to sell 12,000 cars per year. In the end, only about 9,000 vehicles were made during its two-year run and the company was shut down in 1982. Ironically, the DeLorean became iconic just a few years later with its prominent role in 1985’s “Back to the Future.” The movie franchise ensured that the car’s legacy would extend well past its seemingly destined fate as an automotive footnote.
The Yugo
The Yugo was a decades-old Soviet-era Yugoslavia automobile imported to the U.S. in 1985. The decision to sell the car in America was the brainchild of entrepreneur Malcolm Bricklin and was destined for failure from the start. In an interview with Car and Driver, Bricklin recalled tasking his employees to find the cheapest car in the world. They did so at a 50-year-old factory in Yugoslavia that was manufacturing a 30-year-old car. “We took this piece-of-crap car and within 14 months had set up 400 U.S. dealers and made 528 changes to the car,” Bricklin said.
Yugoslavia had been manufacturing the car for years. Bricklin’s plan was to spruce it up and bring to America. There was no amount of changes that could overcome the vehicle’s poor quality, however. The Yugo’s engine generated a measly 55 horsepower, making the car dangerous to drive on American roads. The car was notoriously unreliable (the rear window defroster was reportedly there to keep your hands warm when you needed to push the vehicle), had many parts made of plastic, and oddly enough, featured carpeting as a standard feature.
But for the people selling the Yugo, the car was all about one thing: profit margin. The vehicle only cost $2,000 wholesale and was sold stateside for nearly twice that. Consumers quickly realized that even $4,000 was too much for the Yugo.
Pontiac Aztek
For as much grief as the Aztek got, it was actually at the forefront of what would prove to be one of the top automotive trends of the past two decades. When the car was first introduced in the early aughts, SUVs were surging in popularity and the idea of crossovers – vehicles with the space and power of an SUV combined with the on-street abilities of a sedan – was just beginning to take hold.
In fact, if you look the Aztek concept car, it doesn’t look all that dissimilar to some of today’s crossover models. Time magazine may have put it best, saying, “The shame is, under all that ugliness, there was a useful, competent crossover.”
Clearly, the idea behind the car was good, but the execution was not. The problem was that the Aztek was designed by committee. No singular, coherent vision took the lead and just about everybody got a say in the design process. Even the bean counters made their mark involved. GM accountants reportedly ordered the Aztek to be built on an existing minivan platform in order to reduce costs. This platform, however, was not long enough to hold the Aztek, forcing designers to create a box-like tail end.
The Aztek was in production all of five years, from 2001-2005. But showing that everything comes full circle, the car got a significant popularity boost when it was prominently featured as Walter White’s vehicle of choice in the uber-popular television show “Breaking Bad.”
Ford Pinto
While most of the cars on this list are here due to aesthetic design fails, poor craftsmanship or lackluster sales, several of the worst cars ever made were actually dangerous to drive. These vehicles had such fundamental mechanical and design flaws that they posed a serious risk to the occupants of the car.
Chrysler’s PT Cruiser had a unique look, which many people derided, but it’s most notable for its mercurial nature. The car was known to shut off in the middle of driving, completely out of the blue. The 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, meanwhile, had an engine that exploded when it made 90 horsepower.
But the most infamously dangerous worst car in history is the Ford Pinto. The only feature that needs to be discussed about this 1970s vehicle is its fuel tank. The Pinto famously featured an exposed fuel tank. Cars involved in rear-end collisions, even at slow speeds, tended to burst into flames. Later on, the “Pinto memo” was publicized, which proved the company concluded it was cheaper to settle victims’ lawsuits ($50 million) than to recall and fix the cars ($120 million).
Aptly, the coda to the Pinto’s story is the car’s presence in American Museum of Tort Law.
Ford Edsel
We’ve reached the pinnacle of the worst cars in history. For decades, the terms “automotive failure” and “the Edsel” have been all but synonymous. So what went so wrong?
In the mid-1950s, Ford came to the conclusion that it should expand its product line. Specifically, it needed a new, mid-priced brand to go in between its flagship Lincoln and mid-level Mercury. Studies predicted that “by 1965 half of all U.S. families … would be buying more cars in the medium-priced field, which already had 60% of the market,” according to Time magazine. And so the Edsel was created, named after Henry Ford’s son, no less.
It’s not so much that the Edsel was such a terrible car – although it certainly had its faults, namely its price. It’s that it suffered the unfortunate fate of being hyped up as the greatest thing on four wheels. Believe it or not, Ford booked an hourlong prime time television slot on CBS to unveil the car, claiming the broadcast day as “E Day.” “The Edsel Show” included performances by Frank Sinatra, Bing Crosby, Rosemary Clooney and Louis Armstrong. By this time, however, the push for compact cars was well underway. Just two years after its prime-time debut, the Edsel’s run was over after less than 120,000 were sold. Ford had estimated it could sell up to 400,000 cars a year. In total, the company spent roughly $350 million on the Edsel’s research, design, tooling and production facilities, the equivalent of nearly $3.2 billion in 2021.
To add insult to injury, while the Edsel was cementing its place as the biggest automotive flop ever, “The Edsel Show” was nominated for an Emmy.
What do you think are some of the worst cars in history? Let us know in the comments below!
372 Thoughts on “The Worst Cars in History”
Leave A Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and may or may not be published at the editor’s discretion. Only comments that are relevant to the article and add value to the Your AAA community will be considered. Comments may be edited for clarity and length.
1979 Bricklin SV1, it basically has a little of all the vehicles listed above. What a conversation starter, as I climbed under it to create vacuum for the headlights to pop up.
Have we all forgotten the Corvair? “Unsafe at any speed” also gave us Ralph Nader.
I had a 1982 Plymouth Horizon. It was quite simply the worst car I have ever had. She stalled out in a snowstorm while traveling normally. She stalled out on the BQE when I hit the brakes. The car alarm would overheat and turn the car off. The drivers seat broke within 5 years.
The 1973 Pontiac Sprint. It was a GTO body with new decals. A true lemon but before lemon laws were passed. Just about everything broke. The only original part left was the radio. Very quick though!
No one mentioned a Mustang II. Worst car I was ever involved with!
I had a late 60s Datsun. After 8 years of wonderful service and great gas mileage, the passenger seat fell through the floor, onto the asphalt. Thankfully, it was parked.
Am I the only proud owner of a Renault LeCar? Front wheel drive axle broke 3X while on the highway! I gave it away and it sat in my sister’s backyard for years with another broken axle…Also had a Vega and a Fiat that almost never ran and I can’t remember the model name…The Vega was the one with the huge cloud of blue smoke following me!
How could any list for the worst vehicles not have the Corvair and the Vega on it!!
Shame
Auto product names are a a class thing – if you’re a worker bee in need a of a boost then Mustang or Gladiator might appeal to you. If you’re an aspiring exec with kids, maybe you’re a Navigator type. If you’re a tree-hugger a Leaf might sound like a pretty good fit. And if you’re athletic enough for the daily commute, maybe you a handle a Fit.
On the other side – the luxury brands use model numbers – Q30, A12, 780i. Sort of the less you say, the more you say – no marketing hormones needed.
So what’s wrong with Friend.Me? I guess it’s just not juiced with the right stuff.
1968 Austin America….Under powered, unstable at any speed, , unreliable, I never knew if it would start…..The best thing that happened to that car was a bunch of kids turned it over onto it’s roof, my insurance paid enough so that I could get rid of it, and buy a real car.
I rented a Pinto for a week in Florida. It was cute! Bright canary yellow, with a tempered glass hatchback! It took me where I had to go. But, to enter the main North-South road in Sarasota, where people are not speed demons anyway, I absolutely had to floor the pedal and keep it there, up to travel speed! I have always believed some of its statistics of rear-end collisions were due to its being unable to get out of its own way. It’s still an attractive-looking car!
What about the Ford Maverick? Inhad one. Terrible car. yes, as posters said above… FORD, stands for: found on road dead or fix or repair daily.
I saw it at the NY Auto show. It was believed that Americans were aching for a new car below the $2,000 price point! It came out at $1,999! I rented one that summer, with plaid cloth seats, am radio, and air-conditioning! I had to close the outside air and turn off the a-c just to be able to climb hills on the highways without losing speed, and used the downhills to cool off the interior! Lucky I didn’t have a whole family with me!
I learned to drive in a Gremlin with three on the tree. After I got my license, my father said “Now you know how to drive any car on the road.”
chevy vega, can of oil with every fill up
1976 Austin Marina in US was supposed to be the family version of the sporty UK MG family. TERRIBLE car. A toy! No power with its terribly weak engine. Parts were crappy for this “cheap” car. My first, by the way. Hey, I wanted a “foreign” car to be cool. I learned.
The Vega belongs on this list because of its terrible aluminum engine which would burn oil like crazy, and its propensity to rust. But at least there was no safety issue involved. Same with the Yugo: a truly poor quality vehicle, but it didn’t stall out or burst into flames. The Edsel and the Aztek were not necessarily flawed vehicles; they were the victims of mistakes made in their marketing or the design of their physical appearance.
The Pinto is by far the worst. Ford’s decision not to recall and fix the cars because it was cheaper just to settle lawsuits, is
a permanent stain on that company.
I see the AMC Pacer & Gremlin but their answer to the Plymouth Barracuda which was the AMC Marlin was one more design failure!
I owned a 1977 Pacer. The car has received a false reputation over the years. I had mine for 10 years and over 100k miles on it. The car got 22 mph and over the life of the car I had two problems with it. I had to replace the carb. And after 10 years the doors began to sag because they were so heavy. I bought the car barebones, no a/c, no power anything and 3 on the floor. I used it to commute to NYC. Extremely comfortable seats, fun to drive, 232 c.i. engine. I’d buy another one in a heart beat.
Ford Escort. I had a 1988 Escort, purchased secondhand. No wonder the previous owner got rid of it. The tie rod broke three times. The transmission died. The fuel gauge went bad. There were several other problems as well. It was in the shop way too many times. Not a good experience.
I do not want to buy any new cars w/ all theTech on board. We are being forced to pay thousands of $$$ for garbage we don’t need. Currently they want hundreds of $$$ to replace tire pressure sensors on my car. I’ve got an old fashion tire pressure gauge that works great and so do my own eyeballs! All this digital tech is purely for CEOs to get rich on selling to suckers who think it’s worthwhile. I don’t need a camera, I don’t need navigation, or any other BS.
The Chevy Corvair was epically bad, as laid out in Ralph Nader’s famous book, ‘Unsafe at any speed ‘